Integral Monitoring System in Cases of Gender Violence VioGén System

José Luis González Álvarez, Juan José López Ossorio, Carlota Urruela, Marina Rodríguez Díaz

Resumen


This paper discusses the normative origins, elements and operative foundations of the Integral Monitoring System in Cases ofGender Violence (VioGén System), a national government software application in Spain, implemented since 2007 to coordinate the actions of Spanish public professionals involved in the monitoring, assistance and protection of abused women and their minor children. Thousands of specialist users from the different integrated institutions access daily this application, which already manages more than 510,000 cases. The law enforcement part of the VioGén System is, for the time being, the most developed one, being the "police assessment of the risk of new violence” one of the main functionalities of the aforementioned system, for which two actuarial questionnaires have been developed (VPR and VPER). These questionnaires count with almost three million assessments; which consequently help in carrying out forensic, penitentiary and welfare assessments. Although the VioGén System currently only deals with cases of gender violence, in the future it may incorporate data on domestic violence, and technically it may be extended to the monitoring of other vulnerable groups.


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


ACPO. Association of Chief Police Officers. (2008). Guidance on investigating domestic abuse. Retrieved from http://library.college.police.uk/docs/npia/Domestic_Abuse_2008.pdf.

Andrés Pueyo, A., Echeburúa, E. (2010). Valoración del riesgo de violencia: instrumentos disponibles e indicaciones de aplicación. Psicothema, 22 (3), 403-409.

Andrews, D. y Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Lexis Nexis.

Belfrage, H., Strand, S., Storey, J.E., Gibas, A.L., Kropp, P.R. y Hart, S.D. (2012). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Law and human behavior, 36(1), 60.

Carter, L., Kay, S.J., George, J.L. y King, P. (2003). Treating children exposed to domes- tic violence. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 3, 183–202. doi: 10.1300/J135v03n03_02.

Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System. (2004). A Handbook for Police Responding Domestic Violence: Promoting Safer Communities by Integrating Research & Practice. London, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System of the London Family Court Clinic.

Consejo General del Poder Judicial (España). Grupo de Expertos en Violencia Domés- tica y de Género (2016). Guía práctica de la Ley Orgánica 1/2004, de 28 de diciembre, de Medidas de Protección Integral contra la Violencia de Género. Retrieved from http://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Temas/Violencia-domestica-y-de-genero/Actividad-del-Observatorio/Guias-practicas/Guia-practica-de-la-Ley-Organica-1-2004--de-28-de-diciembre--de-Medidas-de-Proteccion-Integral-contra-la-Violencia-de-Genero--2016-

Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Safety Packing List. Office on Women’s Health. US.

Garrido, M. J. (2012). Validación del procedimiento de valoración del riesgo de los casos de violencia de género del Ministerio del Interior de España [doctoral thesis]. Madrid: Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

González, J. L. y Garrido, M. J. (2015a). Satisfacción de las víctimas de violencia de género con la actuación policial en España. Validación del Sistema VioGén. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25, 29-38.

González, J. L. y Garrido, M. J. (2015b). Utilidad de las medidas policiales de protección de víctimas de violencia de género en España. Opinión de los agentes. Cuadernos de la Guardia Civil, 51, 41-61.

Kropp, P. R. (2008). Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management. Violence and victims, 23(2), 202-220.

López-Ossorio, J.J. (2017).Construcción y validación de los formularios de valoración policial del riesgo de reincidencia y violencia grave contra la pareja (VPR4.0 – VPER4.0) del Ministerio del Interior de España [doctoral thesis]. Madrid: Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

López-Ossorio, J.J., González, J.L. y Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2016). Eficacia predictiva de la valoración policial del riesgo de la violencia de género. Psychosocial Intervention, 25, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psi.2015.10.002.

López-Ossorio, J.J., González, J.L., Buquerín, S., García, L.F. y Buela-Casal, G. (2017). Risk factors related to intimate partner violence police recidivism in Spain. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17, 107-119.

Muñoz, J.M. y López-Ossorio, J.J. (2016). Valoración psicológica del riesgo de violencia: alcance y limitaciones para su uso en el contexto forense. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 26, 130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.apj.2016.04.005.

Murray, C.E., Horton, G.E., Johnson, C.H., Notestine, L., Garr, B.,

Marsh, A., Flasch, P. y Doom, E.B. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ perceptions of safety planning: A focus group study. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 381-392. doi: 10.1007/ s10896- 015-9674-1

Rice, M., Harris, G., y Lang, C. (2013). Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R). Psychological Assessment, 25(3). doi.10.1037/a0032878.

Rossegger, A., Endrass, J., Gerth, J., y Singh, J. (2014). Replicating the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide: A Total Forensic Cohort Study. Plos ONE, 9(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091845.

Singh, J. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 8-22. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2052

SNZ. Standards New Zealand. (2006). Screening, risk assessment and intervention for family violence including child abuse and neglect, NZS 8006:2006, Wellington. Retrieved from http://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/nzs-8006-2006.pdf

Storey, J. E., Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Belfrage, H., y Strand, S. (2014). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the evaluation of risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 256-271.

UNODC, United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime. (2010) Handbook on Effective Police Responses to Violence against Women. Criminal Justice Handbook Series. New York, United States. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Handbook_on_Effective_police_responses_to_violence_against_women_English.pdf

WAVE. Women Against Violence Europe. (2012). Protect II. Competencias para la Evaluación del Riesgo y la Gestión de la Seguridad para la protección de Víctimas de Alto Riesgo. Women Against Violence Europe (WAVE), European Network and Euro- pean Info Center Against Violence. Viena, Austria. Retrieved from http://fileserver.wave-network.org/trainingmanuals/PROTECTII_Risk_Assessment_and_Safety_2012_Spanish.pdf

Zurita, J. (2013). La lucha contra la violencia de género. Seguridad y ciudadanía. Revista del Ministerio del Interior, 9, 63-127.

Zurita, J. (2014). Violencia contra la mujer. Marco histórico evolutivo y predicción del nivel de riesgo [doctoral thesis]. Madrid: Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.