Analysis of the crime of scam from forensic psychology: an interdisciplinary proposal.
pdf (Español (España))

Keywords

Crime, scams, criminology, victimology, legal psychology.

How to Cite

Pérez Martínez, A., & López Pérez, R. (2023). Analysis of the crime of scam from forensic psychology: an interdisciplinary proposal. Behavior & Law Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.47442/blj.2023.95

Abstract

The study of scam has been carried out, predominantly, from jurisprudence and legal psychology; Introducing the behavioral economic component into studies of fraud and assessing the possible determinants is a novel perspective of analysis incorporated in this article. The objective is to analyze the functioning of the scam as a fraudulent behavior, discerning elements of the scammers and their victims, from an epistemological position focused on forensic psychology, criminology, victimology and behavioral economics. The research is a systematic review of a qualitative, descriptive type, the search and analysis of primary and secondary sources of information is carried out, which are found in databases of high academic impact. Deductive and analytical-synthetic methods are applied. The conclusions highlight the need to continue developing research that delve into the characteristics of the subjects involved in the scam.

https://doi.org/10.47442/blj.2023.95
pdf (Español (España))

References

Arce, R., Fariña, F., y Novo, M. (2005). Psicología Jurídica. Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense.

Arenas, J. D. (2021). Economía conductual de la protección al consumidor en el e-commerce colombiano. Cuadernos de Economía, 40(82), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78584

Asamblea Nacional de la República de Ecuador. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/ECU/INT_CEDAW_ARL_ECU_18950_S.pdf

Ashby M. P. J. (2020). Initial evidence on the relationship between the coronavirus pandemic and crime in the United States. Crime Science, 9(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00117-6

Burnes, D., Henderson, C.R., Sheppard, C., Zhao, R., Pillemer, K., & Lachs, M.S. (2017). Prevalence of financial fraud and scams among older adults in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 107(8), 13–21. https://bit.ly/3gGJvKb

Button, M., Lewis, Ch. y Tapley, J. (2014). Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal, 27(1), 36–54. https://bit.ly/3OyTWen

Button, M. y Cross, C. (2017). Cyber frauds, scams and their victims. Routledge.

Cabanellas, G. (2015). Diccionario Jurídico Elemental. Heliasta. http://www.iterra.edu.mx/centro/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/88047784-Diccionario-Juridico-Elemental-Guillermo-Cabanellas-de-Torres-1.pdf

Cáceres, A. (2021). El delito de estafa, la problemática de las estafas piramidales. Trabajo Fin de Grado de Derecho. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Jurídicas y de la Comunicación. Universidad de Valladolid.

Caneppele, S., & Aebi, M. F. (2019). Crime drop or police recording flop? On the relationship between the decrease of offline crime and the increase of online and hybrid crimes. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 13(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax055

Chen, H., Beaudoin, C. E., & Hong, T. (2017). Securing online privacy: An empirical test on Internet scam victimization, online privacy concerns, and privacy protection behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.003

Deevy, M., Lucich, S., y Beals, M. (2012). Scams, schemes and swindles: A review of consumer financial fraud research. Financial Fraud Research Center. https://stanford.io/3OwZUMS

DeLiema M., Deevy M., Lusardi A., Mitchell O. S. (2020). Financial fraud among older Americans: Evidence and implications. The Journal of Gerontology B: Social Sciences, 75(4), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby151

European Central Bank (2018). Fifth Report on Card Fraud. https://bit.ly/3QkUNRM

Galván, A. (2020). ¿Forma parte la estafa del derecho penal económico? En E. D. Crespo, D.C. Caro y M. E. Escobar (Eds). Problemas y retos actuales del Derecho Penal Económico, (pp. 91-98). Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. http://doi.org/10.18239/congresos_2020.24.00

Golladay, K., & Holtfreter, K. (2017). The Consequences of Identity Theft Victimization: An Examination of Emotional and Physical Health Outcomes. Victims & Offenders, 12(5), 741-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1177766

Hanoch, Y., & Wood, S. (2021). The scams among us: Who falls prey and why. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 30, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421995489

Hawdon, J., Parti, K., & Dearden T. E. (2020). Cybercrime in America amid COVID-19: The initial results from a natural experiment. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09534-4

Hernández, L. A. (2022). Casinos. Un análisis de la organización interaccional de la estafa. Xihmai, 17(33), 153–190. https://doi.org/10.37646/xihmai.v17i33.541

Jones, H. S., Towse, J. N., Race, N., & Harrison, T. (2019). Email fraud: The search for psychological predictors of susceptibility. PLoS One, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209684

Kahneman, D. (2017). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Debolsillo.

Kemp, S. y Moneva, A. (2020). Fraude online vs. offline: factores predictores de victimización y su impacto. InDret Criminología, 1, 424-444. https://bit.ly/3n7zuG0

Kemp, S., Buil-Gil, D., Moneva, A., Miró-Linares, F., & Díaz-Castaño, N. (2021). Empty streets, busy internet: A time-series analysis of cybercrime and fraud trends during COVID-19. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(4), 480–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862211027986

Klapatch, L., Hanoch, Y., Wood, S. & Hengerer, D. (2022) Consumers’ response to mass market scam solicitations: profiling scams and responses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28, 1-19. https://bit.ly/3fatVGA

Laroche, H., Steyer, V., & Theron, C. (2019) How could you be so gullible?. Scams and over-trust in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3941-z

Lazarus, S., Button, M., & Kapend, R. (2022). Exploring the value of feminist theory in understanding digital crimes: Gender and cybercrime types. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 61(3), 381-398. https://bit.ly/3fffpx0

Levi, M. (2017). Assessing the trends, scale and nature of economic cybercrimes: Overview and Issues. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9645-3

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Linde, A., & Aebi, M. F. (2021). ¿Realmente theft quiere decir hurto? y otras equivalencias dudosas entre las definiciones legales y criminológicas de las infracciones: Consecuencias para el estudio de la delincuencia. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 19(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v19i2.529

Maniar, K., Rathod, S., Kumar, A., & Jain, S. K. (2022). A Forensic Psychological Study for Detection of Deception in Financial Fraud Calls on Layered Voice Analysis (LVATm). The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 10(1), 572-585. https://bit.ly/3zrEPyx

Mueller, E. A., Wood, S. A., Hanoch, Y., Huang, Y., & Reed, C. (2020). Older and wiser: The protective role of emotional intelligence in age-related susceptibility to financial fraud. Journal of Elder Neglect & Abuse, 32(2), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2020.1736704

Norris, G., Brookes, A., & Dowell, D. (2019). The psychology of internet fraud victimization: A systematic review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09334-5

Parejo-Pizarro, I. (2017). La estafa piramidal: un estudio exploratorio desde la víctima. Journal of Negative & No Positive Results, 2(2), 62-68. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5826471

Payne B. K. (2020). Criminals work from home during pandemics too: A public health approach to respond to fraud and crimes against those 50 and above. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09532-6

Rathod, S., Kumar, A., & Jain, S.K. (2022). Cyber Psychological Case Studies of Sextortion for Identifying the Accused in the Offences Committed on Social Media. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(1), 42-52. https://ijsrcseit.com/paper/CSEIT22815.pdf

Reep-van den Bergh, C.M.M., & Junger, M. (2018). Victims of cybercrime in Europe: A review of victim surveys. Crime Science, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0079-3

Schoepfer, A. y Piquero, N. L. (2009). Studying the correlates of fraud victimization and reporting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 209–215. https://bit.ly/3Aa2NzB

Shao K., Zhang Q., Ren Y., Li X., Lin T. (2019). Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults’ vulnerability to fraud. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 31(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2019.1625842

Sunstein, C. & Thaler, R. (2017). Un pequeño empujón. El impulso que necesitas para tomar mejores decisiones sobre salud, dinero y felicidad. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, S.A.S.

Titus, R. M., Heinzelmann, F., y Boyle, J. M. (1995). Victimization of Persons by Fraud. Crime y Delinquency, 41(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041001004

Tzani, C., Ioannou, M., Lester, D. et al. (2022). Profiling HMRC and IRS Scammers by Utilising Trolling Videos: the Scam Script. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(3), . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09520-y

van de Weijer, S.G.A., & Leukfeldt, E.R. (2017). Big five personality traits of cybercrime victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(7), 407–412. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28657783/

van de Weijer, S. G. A., Leukfeldt, R., & Bernasco, W. (2019). Determinants of reporting cybercrime: A comparison between identity theft, consumer fraud, and hacking. European Journal of Criminology, 16(4), 486–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818773610

Van Wyk, J. y Mason, K. A. (2001). Investigating Vulnerability and Reporting Behavior for Consumer Fraud Victimization: Opportunity as a Social Aspect of Age. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17(4), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986201017004003

Weitmann, A. (2009). El caso Madoff. Los secretos de la estafa del siglo. La Esfera de los Libros.

Whittaker, J. M. & Button, M. (2020). Understanding pet scams: A case study of advance fee and non-delivery fraud using victims’ accounts. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 497-514. https://bit.ly/3sHagky

Whittaker, J.M., Edwards, M., Cross, C. & Button, M. (2022). “I Have Only Checked after the Event”: Consumer Approaches to Safe Online Shopping. Victims & Offenders, 17(7), 1-23. https://bit.ly/3fhKwIu

Whitty, M.T. (2020). Is There a Scam for Everyone? Psychologically Profiling Cyberscam Victims. European Journal on Criminal Policy Research, 26, 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09458-z

Williams, M. L. (2016), Guardians Upon High: An Application of Routine Activities Theory to Online Identity Theft in Europe at the Country and Individual Level. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv011

Wood, S., Liu, P.-J., Hanoch, Y., Xi, P. M., & Klapatch, L. (2018). Call to claim your prize: Perceived benefits and risk drive intention to comply in a mass marketing scam. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(2), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000167

Yar, M. y Steinmetz, K. F. (2019). Cybercrime and society (3a edición). Sage Publications.

Zuckoff, M. (2005). El esquema de Ponzi: La verdadera historia de una leyenda financiera. Editorial Random House Publishing Group.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Behavior & Law Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.